A friend recently asked me the following:
Do the kinists have a hatred for other races? I see… feel… their animosity towards mexicans, blacks, arabians… I thought kinism was just about preserving the natural races that God gave us. Maybe I’ve missed the point all along?
“Kinism” with all its polish is what you’ll see over at “Faith & Heritage” and is something like what you’ve said: concern for preserving and maintaining God-ordained distinctions (especially racial) among men.
(Most Kinists are also ethnic-nationalists of some sort, meaning: we believe ethnically-homogenous nation-states — run by Biblical law — are the normative state of man.)
Towards that end, we have various non-white friends now claiming to be Kinists. We’re hoping to recruit more non-whites to the Kinist cause, but as you can imagine: given the nature of Kinism, we’re more concerned with our own folk. A Kinist thinks of this sort of outreach as a form of missionary work. Christ commands us to “go into all the nations, preaching what I have taught you.” So, if there are any of us with a missionary spirit (I’ve sometimes been compelled to do it) then we’ll reach out to other racial communities.
I’ve been witnessing to blacks on Pal Talk along these lines. The black community is ripe for a truly Christian view of race and nationalism. For so long they’ve been inundated with false views like Marxism and black liberation theology. They need a strong presentation of Kinism.
All that said, I need to raise two issues:
1. When we wake up from the indoctrination and lies of pop-culture and begin respecting God-ordained distinctions among men, we start thinking in terms of those distinctions. We begin talking about classes of people. For example, we can talk about “The Blacks” … we can talk about “The Arabs” etc. We can generalize to a degree. All races have a purpose and they all have different strengths and weaknesses.
So, racial-realism is part-n-parcel with a Christian view of race.
And,
2. When we begin looking at racial groups this way, we find out that we’re not the only ones. In fact, movers and shakers in the world have always seen racial groups as “groups” and have sought to manipulate them to gain power. For instance, in Communist Russia, entire races were bussed off of their homeland and moved around, integrated, planted among other racial groups to destabilize regions.
It’s been long recognized by the “bad guys”, that mass-integration of races, destabilizes society and keeps it from being able to present a forceful, unified position. In that way, the strong-arm of the state always wins out.
So the various racial groups are, in some sense, being pitted against each other and most especially, racial minorities in America are being used to break up the power-base of the founding white-stock in this country (who are mostly conservative and Christian). This is happening through the indoctrination of the racial minorities, laws giving them preferential treatment and a general sense of false-esteem and courage that’s implanted in their group-psyche through pop-culture, public school, etc.
Now, much much more can be said about all that, but I raise these two points, to say this:
What you’re seeing among Kinists is the very front-lines of the counter-offensive. You’re talking to men in the trenches, and as we both know — trenches aren’t the best place for a lady. You’ll likely hear the gruff language of angry men.
In the kinist view, minorities are being used against us. Most of them have a natural disdain for the white race anyway. (It’s not as if they were peaceful, noble people, thriving in their own utopias before the white man showed up and ruined it all.) In many cases, these people were cannibals, baby-killers, and depraved in all sorts of ways.
We whites are the Christ-bearing race. We are His banner-carriers.
That makes us targets of all other groups. And other groups (blacks especially) only thrive when they are under the strong influence of white, Christian society. (Notice: blacks don’t want ethnic nationalism. If they wanted a black-run government, there are many counties in Alabama and Louisianna that are exclusively black. Also, Detroit is almost an exclusively black municipality. But blacks do not want to live there because they’re third-world-style hell-holes. Blacks want to live where they can reap the benefits of white society.)
The racial-realism of Kinists allows them to see the world truly and thus they often speak frankly about other races.
This may be over-emphasized at times by some kinists, for example, it may be wrong to insult Germans as a group. But when you’re a solider in the trenches of WWII, lampooning your enemies becomes a matter of morale and survival.
Blacks get the bulk of Kinist insults, because they especially, are our enemies right now. They’re being manipulated against us and being used along those ends, and along those ends, their natural (and savage) inclinations as a people, are taking them over. Many kinists, there in the trenches, are mad as hell about it. (The same is true for the in-coming Mestizo population, who are further destabilizing the white-Christian majority.)
But with all that, don’t forget Kinists do have a missionary spirit towards minorities and if we ever come across one open to our ideas and willing to hear us out, then we’ll be very excited about letting him (or her) in and welcoming them as we would welcome a Christian from another nation.
But we can’t overlook the fact that (either knowingly or unknowingly) many of these people are our enemies.
Hope that helps explain some of the animosity you’re seeing out there…(even if you don’t agree with it.)



Dealing with one’s adversaries in civilized manner is always a problem. But I do find it interesting that some the rabid anti-Kinist Babelist don’t have problem with Neocon warmongering or even calling for the genocide of Arabs and Persians.
Yes! The alienist hypocrisy is incredible!
I’ve often wondered how such a (supposedly) holy bunch of people could descend into the most vile den of hypocrites, liars and intellectually dishonest ilk out there.
As to civility among Kinists…
Frankly, I think there’s a point when civility becomes something like treason.
Our ideological foes deserve much more than satire.
I admire the strength and courage that you all have. Such brave men.
I just re-read this and should add:
By “letting them in” … I don’t mean we’re open to amalgamation.
I meant something more like: we’d welcome them in like we’d welcome someone from another country into ours, temporarily, as a friend or something like that.
They’ll never be able to be a part of our nation, any more than we could be a part of theirs.
To desire otherwise would be sinful. Kind of like a woman desiring to be a man (or vice versa).
Thriving in our Godly contexts is the job of a human.